Digging for Fire
2015 · 83 min · Director: Joe Swanberg
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Tim and Lee are married with a young child. The chance to stay at a fancy home in the Hollywood Hills is complicated by Tim's discovery of a bone and a rusty old gun in the yard. Tim is excited by the idea of a mystery, but Lee doesn't want him to dig any further, preferring that he focus on the family taxes, which he promised to do weeks ago. This disagreement sends them on separate and unexpected adventures over the course of a weekend, as Tim and his friends seek clues to the mystery while Lee searches for answers to the bigger questions of marriage and parenthood.
Emotional fingerprint
Digging for Fire (2015) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Curiosity 30%, Humor 25%, Love 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Curiosity30%
- Humor25%
- Love20%
- Confusion15%
- Melancholy10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Curiosity, Humor, Love. Genres: Comedy, Drama. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Curiosity, Humor and Love. Its IMDb rating of 5.8/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 60/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Empathy
- Humor
- Love
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Love
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Empathy
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Empathy | Humor | Love |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Love | 37 % | 20 % | 23 % | 27 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 6′ | Humor | 39 % | 29 % | 29 % | 21 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 10′ | Humor | 38 % | 35 % | 31 % | 18 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 15′ | Humor | 35 % | 28 % | 28 % | 16 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 19′ | Curiosity | 43 % | 15 % | 29 % | 10 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 23′ | Curiosity | 50 % | 16 % | 35 % | 5 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 27′ | Humor | 48 % | 23 % | 39 % | 5 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 31′ | Humor | 49 % | 28 % | 39 % | 9 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 35′ | Empathy | 51 % | 35 % | 31 % | 13 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 39′ | Curiosity | 49 % | 33 % | 23 % | 11 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 44′ | Curiosity | 46 % | 32 % | 19 % | 15 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 48′ | Empathy | 45 % | 41 % | 19 % | 18 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 52′ | Empathy | 51 % | 45 % | 19 % | 13 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 56′ | Tension | 56 % | 40 % | 20 % | 13 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 60′ | Humor | 50 % | 34 % | 27 % | 19 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 64′ | Tension | 48 % | 36 % | 27 % | 23 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 68′ | Tension | 54 % | 36 % | 18 % | 20 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 73′ | Curiosity | 60 % | 33 % | 13 % | 29 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 77′ | Love | 63 % | 37 % | 13 % | 48 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 81′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
Cinderella
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Digging for Fire. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Jude
Cashier
Adam
Uber Driver #1
Details
- Directed by
- Joe Swanberg
- Written by
- Joe Swanberg, Jake Johnson
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2015
- Runtime
- 83 min
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Curiosity
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Free
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
