Quo Vadis
1951 · 174 min · Director: Mervyn LeRoy
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
After fierce Roman commander Marcus Vinicius becomes infatuated with beautiful Christian hostage Lygia, he begins to question the tyrannical leadership of the despotic emperor Nero.
Emotional fingerprint
Quo Vadis (1951) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Awe 30%, Love 25%, Anxiety 18%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Awe30%
- Love25%
- Anxiety18%
- Sadness15%
- Inspiration12%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Awe, Love, Anxiety. Genres: Drama, Romance, History. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Awe, Love and Anxiety. Its IMDb rating of 7.1/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 71/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Sadness
- Disturbing
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Disturbing
Dominant emotion: Love
Dominant emotion: Hope
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Sadness | Disturbing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 4′ | Tension | 43 % | 35 % | 18 % | 33 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 13′ | Disturbing | 36 % | 23 % | 10 % | 21 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 22′ | Love | 35 % | 19 % | 6 % | 14 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 30′ | Love | 40 % | 29 % | 10 % | 24 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 39′ | Disturbing | 41 % | 35 % | 13 % | 31 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 48′ | Love | 41 % | 36 % | 14 % | 30 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 57′ | Tension | 44 % | 39 % | 16 % | 30 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 65′ | Hope | 45 % | 39 % | 20 % | 25 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 74′ | Hope | 48 % | 35 % | 23 % | 19 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 83′ | Love | 53 % | 36 % | 20 % | 25 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 91′ | Tension | 63 % | 53 % | 21 % | 45 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 100′ | Tension | 75 % | 70 % | 35 % | 61 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 109′ | Tension | 78 % | 73 % | 45 % | 65 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 117′ | Disturbing | 73 % | 68 % | 43 % | 60 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 126′ | Tension | 72 % | 59 % | 51 % | 49 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 135′ | Sadness | 79 % | 54 % | 70 % | 50 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 144′ | Sadness | 83 % | 63 % | 71 % | 60 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 152′ | Love | 84 % | 74 % | 55 % | 64 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 161′ | Tension | 80 % | 73 % | 41 % | 64 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 170′ | Hope | 70 % | 62 % | 37 % | 57 % |
Riches to rags
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Eunice
Pomponia
Nazarius
Terpnos
Seneca
Phaon
Chilo
Croton
Details
- Directed by
- Mervyn LeRoy
- Written by
- Henryk Sienkiewicz, John Lee Mahin, Sonya Levien, S. N. Behrman
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 1951
- Runtime
- 174 min
- Country
- United States of America
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Awe
- Data updated
Where to watch
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
