Vanishing Point
1971 · 105 min · Director: Richard C. Sarafian, Richard C. Sarafian
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Kowalski works for a car delivery service, and takes delivery of a 1970 Dodge Challenger to drive from Colorado to San Francisco. Shortly after pickup, he takes a bet to get the car there in less than 15 hours.
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
Vanishing Point (1971) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Excitement 35%, Tension 25%, Melancholy 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Excitement35%
- Tension25%
- Melancholy20%
- Anxiety10%
- Awe10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Excitement, Tension, Melancholy. Genres: Thriller, Drama, Crime. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Excitement, Tension and Melancholy. Its IMDb rating of 7.2/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 73/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Curiosity
- Excitement
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Excitement
Dominant emotion: Hope
Dominant emotion: Melancholy
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Curiosity | Excitement |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Curiosity | 40 % | 33 % | 37 % | 12 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Tension | 39 % | 31 % | 30 % | 18 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 13′ | Excitement | 39 % | 21 % | 21 % | 30 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 18′ | Excitement | 45 % | 25 % | 19 % | 38 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 24′ | Tension | 50 % | 39 % | 20 % | 38 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 29′ | Excitement | 46 % | 38 % | 23 % | 34 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 34′ | Curiosity | 43 % | 36 % | 31 % | 23 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 39′ | Tension | 45 % | 44 % | 38 % | 18 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 45′ | Tension | 50 % | 50 % | 35 % | 19 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 50′ | Tension | 51 % | 49 % | 32 % | 16 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 55′ | Curiosity | 49 % | 44 % | 31 % | 16 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 60′ | Tension | 45 % | 38 % | 29 % | 16 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 66′ | Hope | 40 % | 25 % | 31 % | 14 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 71′ | Curiosity | 43 % | 28 % | 35 % | 11 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 76′ | Tension | 48 % | 41 % | 35 % | 9 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 81′ | Curiosity | 46 % | 43 % | 33 % | 13 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 87′ | Hope | 45 % | 38 % | 24 % | 21 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 92′ | Hope | 43 % | 30 % | 18 % | 21 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 97′ | Melancholy | 40 % | 25 % | 18 % | 17 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 102′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Sheriff
Second Girl
Communications Officer
Police Dispatcher
Communications Officer
Details
- Directed by
- Richard C. Sarafian, Richard C. Sarafian
- Written by
- Malcolm Hart, Guillermo Cabrera Infante, Barry Hall
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 1971
- Runtime
- 105 min
- Country
- United States of America
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Excitement
- Data updated
Where to watch
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.





