My Dinner with Andre
1981 · 112 min · Director: Louis Malle
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Two old friends meet for dinner; as one tells anecdotes detailing his experiences, the other notices their differing worldviews.
Emotional fingerprint
My Dinner with Andre (1981) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Curiosity 35%, Empathy 25%, Confusion 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Curiosity35%
- Empathy25%
- Confusion20%
- Humor10%
- Inspiration10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Curiosity, Empathy, Confusion. Genres: Drama. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Curiosity, Empathy and Confusion. Its IMDb rating of 7.6/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 75/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Curiosity
- Melancholy
- Anxiety
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Awe
Dominant emotion: Melancholy
Dominant emotion: Anxiety
Dominant emotion: Empathy
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Curiosity | Melancholy | Anxiety |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Curiosity | 33 % | 35 % | 18 % | 18 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Curiosity | 35 % | 39 % | 10 % | 14 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 14′ | Curiosity | 41 % | 45 % | 4 % | 9 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 20′ | Awe | 45 % | 46 % | 4 % | 8 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 25′ | Awe | 45 % | 44 % | 14 % | 10 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 31′ | Melancholy | 44 % | 43 % | 24 % | 16 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 36′ | Curiosity | 44 % | 45 % | 19 % | 21 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 42′ | Curiosity | 50 % | 45 % | 15 % | 31 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 48′ | Anxiety | 57 % | 35 % | 26 % | 48 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 53′ | Anxiety | 54 % | 28 % | 34 % | 45 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 59′ | Curiosity | 42 % | 34 % | 26 % | 26 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 64′ | Curiosity | 40 % | 40 % | 21 % | 19 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 70′ | Empathy | 45 % | 39 % | 24 % | 26 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 76′ | Anxiety | 51 % | 36 % | 28 % | 43 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 81′ | Anxiety | 53 % | 33 % | 26 % | 44 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 87′ | Empathy | 45 % | 34 % | 16 % | 24 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 92′ | Curiosity | 41 % | 39 % | 15 % | 19 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 98′ | Melancholy | 48 % | 36 % | 29 % | 30 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 104′ | Empathy | 54 % | 30 % | 43 % | 32 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 109′ | Melancholy | 53 % | 27 % | 48 % | 28 % |
Riches to rags
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Details
- Directed by
- Louis Malle
- Written by
- Andre Gregory, Wallace Shawn, Wallace Shawn, Andre Gregory
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 1981
- Runtime
- 112 min
- Country
- United States of America
- Genres
- Drama
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Curiosity
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
