New York, New York
1977 · 163 min · Director: Martin Scorsese, Martin Scorsese
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
An egotistical saxophone player and a young singer meet on V-J Day and embark upon a strained and rocky romance, even as their careers begin a long uphill climb.
Emotional fingerprint
New York, New York (1977) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Melancholy 30%, Love 25%, Sadness 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Melancholy30%
- Love25%
- Sadness20%
- Humor15%
- Satisfaction10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Melancholy, Love, Sadness. Genres: Drama, Romance, Music. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Melancholy, Love and Sadness. Its IMDb rating of 6.6/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 68/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Joy
- Love
- Tension
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Joy
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Love
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Joy | Love | Tension |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 4′ | Joy | 63 % | 52 % | 17 % | 13 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 12′ | Humor | 48 % | 29 % | 12 % | 26 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 20′ | Humor | 37 % | 14 % | 8 % | 30 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 29′ | Humor | 37 % | 16 % | 16 % | 24 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 37′ | Love | 40 % | 21 % | 31 % | 19 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 45′ | Love | 43 % | 22 % | 39 % | 22 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 53′ | Love | 47 % | 21 % | 43 % | 26 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 61′ | Love | 52 % | 25 % | 49 % | 27 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 69′ | Love | 53 % | 25 % | 43 % | 30 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 77′ | Sadness | 50 % | 22 % | 30 % | 32 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 86′ | Joy | 46 % | 20 % | 23 % | 33 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 94′ | Tension | 53 % | 13 % | 16 % | 47 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 102′ | Tension | 57 % | 13 % | 16 % | 47 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 110′ | Love | 55 % | 24 % | 26 % | 38 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 118′ | Tension | 64 % | 23 % | 26 % | 53 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 126′ | Sadness | 69 % | 19 % | 21 % | 53 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 134′ | Joy | 57 % | 30 % | 21 % | 25 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 143′ | Joy | 49 % | 40 % | 22 % | 11 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 151′ | Joy | 43 % | 34 % | 20 % | 9 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 159′ | Humor | 35 % | 21 % | 19 % | 10 % |
Man in a hole
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Frankie Harte
Ellen Flannery
Desk Clerk
Jimmy Doyle Jr.
Record Producer
Details
- Directed by
- Martin Scorsese, Martin Scorsese
- Written by
- Fred Ebb, Mardik Martin, Earl Mac Rauch
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 1977
- Runtime
- 163 min
- Country
- United States of America
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Melancholy
- Data updated
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
