Emotional fingerprint
Viking Wolf (2022) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Fear 35%, Anxiety 25%, Disturbing 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Fear35%
- Anxiety25%
- Disturbing20%
- Surprise10%
- Confusion10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Fear, Anxiety, Disturbing. Genres: Thriller, Mystery, Horror. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Fear, Anxiety and Disturbing. Its IMDb rating of 5.2/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 57/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Fear
- Sadness
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Disturbing
Dominant emotion: Fear
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Fear | Sadness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Tension | 49 % | 42 % | 31 % | 6 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 7′ | Curiosity | 50 % | 41 % | 31 % | 15 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 12′ | Tension | 62 % | 53 % | 42 % | 33 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 17′ | Sadness | 65 % | 49 % | 34 % | 46 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 22′ | Disturbing | 60 % | 39 % | 23 % | 43 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 27′ | Curiosity | 54 % | 36 % | 21 % | 32 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 32′ | Curiosity | 55 % | 35 % | 18 % | 36 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 36′ | Sadness | 60 % | 40 % | 21 % | 39 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 41′ | Tension | 65 % | 55 % | 38 % | 32 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 46′ | Tension | 75 % | 71 % | 61 % | 39 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 51′ | Fear | 79 % | 70 % | 64 % | 38 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 56′ | Curiosity | 72 % | 55 % | 44 % | 21 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 61′ | Curiosity | 65 % | 51 % | 35 % | 21 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 65′ | Tension | 63 % | 56 % | 38 % | 30 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 70′ | Curiosity | 71 % | 66 % | 51 % | 30 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 75′ | Fear | 84 % | 81 % | 76 % | 31 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 80′ | Fear | 91 % | 89 % | 88 % | 44 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 85′ | Tension | 90 % | 80 % | 74 % | 60 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 90′ | Sadness | 75 % | 46 % | 38 % | 64 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 95′ | Sadness | 57 % | 15 % | 10 % | 55 % |
Riches to rags
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Viking Wolf. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Oddgeir Svelvik
Hege Sunde
Professor Amundsen
Vidar Uthaug
Elin Gran
Paul Arntzen
Dr. Andersen
Sondre Bergquist
Jon Roger Blystad
Brynjar Andersen
Details
- Directed by
- Stig Svendsen
- Written by
- Espen Aukan, Stig Svendsen
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2022
- Runtime
- 97 min
- Country
- Norway, Denmark
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Fear
- Data updated
Where to watch
Data: JustWatch
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
