feeldb

Ivan the Terrible, Part II: The Boyars' Plot

1958 · 82 min · Director: Sergei Eisenstein ★ IMDb 7.7 · 8,913 ratings

Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)

This is the second part of a projected three-part epic biopic of Russian Czar Ivan Grozny, undertaken by Soviet film-maker Sergei Eisenstein at the behest of Josef Stalin. Production of the epic was stopped before the third part could be filmed, due to producer dissatisfaction with Eisenstein's introducing forbidden experimental filming techniques into the material, more evident in this part than the first part. As it was, this second part was banned from showings until after the deaths of both Eisenstein and Stalin, and a change of attitude by the subsequent heads of the Soviet government. In this part, as Ivan the Terrible attempts to consolidate his power by establishing a personal army, his political rivals, the Russian boyars, plot to assassinate him.

Ask Kadri

Trailer for Ivan the Terrible, Part II: The Boyars' Plot

Playing the trailer connects to YouTube. No connection is made until you choose to play.

Rate how it felt
Working…

Your viewing check-in

Emotional fingerprint

Ivan the Terrible, Part II: The Boyars' Plot (1958) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Awe 30%, Tension 25%, Disturbing 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure

  1. Awe30%

AI estimate · no viewer votes yet

How we measure

AI estimate

Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.

Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.

Why it feels this way

The strongest emotional signals are Awe, Tension, Disturbing. Genres: Drama, History. AI estimate.

Is it worth watching?

Consider this title if you are looking for Awe, Tension and Disturbing. Its IMDb rating of 7.7/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 73/100.

How did it make you feel?

Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.

Pick up to three · 0/3

1
2
3

Emotional journey

AI · from subtitles
  • Tension
  • Disturbing
  • Curiosity

Not enough subtitle evidence

No dominant emotion

Dominant emotion: Curiosity

Dominant emotion: Tension

Dominant emotion: Sympathy

Dominant emotion: Disturbing

Tension
Disturbing
Curiosity
Emotional journey Emotional intensity over the film’s runtime, from quieter to stronger on a fixed 0–1 scale. Hatched intervals have insufficient subtitle evidence. The table provides the values. Not enough subtitle evidence
Ending hidden

Dominant emotion

Intensity dips around 3 %, then rises around 23 %, then peaks around 83 %.Ending hidden

Emotional journey
%Approximate minuteDominant emotionOverall intensityTensionDisturbingCuriosity
2.5 %≈ 2′Curiosity40 %33 %10 %37 %
7.5 %≈ 6′Tension50 %43 %21 %36 %
12.5 %≈ 10′Sympathy54 %43 %29 %33 %
17.5 %≈ 14′Curiosity51 %41 %32 %29 %
22.5 %≈ 18′Disturbing60 %54 %46 %31 %
27.5 %≈ 23′Tension69 %65 %56 %44 %
32.5 %≈ 27′Tension70 %68 %53 %51 %
37.5 %≈ 31′Tension64 %63 %40 %44 %
42.5 %≈ 35′Tension60 %60 %38 %40 %
47.5 %≈ 39′Tension70 %69 %53 %46 %
52.5 %≈ 43′Disturbing75 %70 %65 %46 %
57.5 %≈ 47′Disturbing71 %64 %65 %41 %
62.5 %≈ 51′Tension69 %63 %56 %41 %
67.5 %≈ 55′Tension66 %63 %48 %45 %
72.5 %≈ 59′Tension69 %68 %46 %54 %
77.5 %≈ 64′Tension74 %74 %46 %60 %
82.5 %≈ 68′Tension75 %75 %47 %58 %
87.5 %≈ 72′Not enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidence
92.5 %≈ 76′Disturbing82 %57 %82 %28 %
97.5 %≈ 80′Disturbing78 %58 %78 %22 %
Riches to rags

Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.

Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.

Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.

Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.

Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.

Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.

AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗

Kadri — your film companion

AI

Ask anything about Ivan the Terrible, Part II: The Boyars' Plot. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.

Kadri

Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about Ivan the Terrible, Part II: The Boyars' Plot — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.

Premise only
Enter to send · Shift + Enter for a new line
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers

Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.

0 responses so far

Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.

Cast

NC
Nikolai Cherkasov

SB
Serafima Birman

PK
Pavel Kadochnikov

MZ
Mikhail Zharov

AB
Amvrosii Buchma

VP
Vsevolod Pudovkin

VP
Vsevolod Pudovkin

Nikolay the Fanatic

MK
Mikhail Kuznetsov

AM
Alexander Mgebrov

AA
Andrei Abrikosov

VB
Vladimir Balashov

VB
Vladimir Balashov

Pyotr Volynets

EP
Erik Pyryev

Ivan IV as a boy

MN
Mikhail Nazvanov

Prince Andrei Kurbsky

PM
Pavel Massalsky

King Sigismund of Poland

AV
Ada Vojtsik

Elena Glinskaya, Ivan's Mother

AR
Aleksandr Rumnyov

The Stranger (uncredited)

SS
Sergey Stolyarov

(uncredited)

ST
Semyon Timoshenko

Kaspar von Oldenbock, Livonian Ambassador (uncredited)

EB
Evgenia Bagorskaya

Lady from Sigismund's court

Details

Directed by
Sergei Eisenstein
Type
Movies
Released
1958
Runtime
82 min
Country
Soviet Union
Genres
Drama, History
Ratings
★ IMDb 7.7 · 8,913 ratings
Feels mostly
Awe
Data updated

Where to watch

Data: JustWatch · Wikidata

Feels similar

More like this →

Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.