Family Plot
1976 · 120 min · Director: Alfred Hitchcock
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Spiritualist Blanche Tyler and her cab-driving boyfriend encounter a pair of serial kidnappers while trailing a missing heir in California.
Emotional fingerprint
Family Plot (1976) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 30%, Tension 25%, Confusion 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Humor30%
- Tension25%
- Confusion20%
- Surprise15%
- Excitement10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Tension, Confusion. Genres: Thriller, Comedy, Mystery. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Tension and Confusion. Its IMDb rating of 6.8/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 70/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Curiosity
- Fear
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Relief
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Curiosity | Fear |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Curiosity | 58 % | 30 % | 58 % | 12 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 9′ | Curiosity | 59 % | 34 % | 56 % | 14 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 15′ | Tension | 59 % | 45 % | 51 % | 20 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 21′ | Humor | 55 % | 45 % | 48 % | 19 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 27′ | Curiosity | 54 % | 36 % | 51 % | 14 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 33′ | Curiosity | 56 % | 30 % | 58 % | 11 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 39′ | Curiosity | 57 % | 31 % | 61 % | 10 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 45′ | Curiosity | 59 % | 43 % | 61 % | 14 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 51′ | Curiosity | 60 % | 49 % | 60 % | 18 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 57′ | Curiosity | 60 % | 48 % | 60 % | 19 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 63′ | Curiosity | 59 % | 49 % | 57 % | 21 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 69′ | Curiosity | 63 % | 56 % | 45 % | 31 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 75′ | Tension | 74 % | 70 % | 34 % | 49 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 81′ | Tension | 73 % | 68 % | 41 % | 45 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 87′ | Curiosity | 61 % | 53 % | 54 % | 25 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 93′ | Curiosity | 61 % | 54 % | 56 % | 24 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 99′ | Tension | 70 % | 68 % | 49 % | 40 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 105′ | Tension | 79 % | 79 % | 36 % | 57 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 111′ | Tension | 83 % | 79 % | 30 % | 61 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 117′ | Relief | 82 % | 72 % | 32 % | 53 % |
Riches to rags
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Victor Constantine
Mrs. Vera Hannagan
Andy Bush
Parson
Ida Cookson (uncredited)
Woman in Cafe with Priest (uncredited)
Details
- Directed by
- Alfred Hitchcock
- Written by
- Ernest Lehman, Victor Canning
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 1976
- Runtime
- 120 min
- Country
- United States of America
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Humor
- Data updated
Where to watch
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
