Jabberwocky
1977 · 105 min · Director: Terry Gilliam
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
After the death of his father, young Dennis Cooper goes to town where he has to pass several adventures. The town and the whole kingdom is threatened by a terrible monster called 'Jabberwocky'. Will Dennis make his fortune? Is anyone brave enough to defeat the monster?
Emotional fingerprint
Jabberwocky (1977) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 35%, Surprise 20%, Excitement 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Humor35%
- Surprise20%
- Excitement20%
- Anxiety15%
- Relief10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Surprise, Excitement. Genres: Comedy, Fantasy. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Surprise and Excitement. Its IMDb rating of 6.1/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 62/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Humor
- Tension
- Disturbing
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Disgust
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Humor | Tension | Disturbing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Tension | 40 % | 30 % | 28 % | 20 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Humor | 43 % | 35 % | 23 % | 15 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 13′ | Humor | 49 % | 41 % | 23 % | 15 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 18′ | Humor | 54 % | 48 % | 26 % | 24 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 24′ | Humor | 54 % | 49 % | 28 % | 31 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 29′ | Humor | 53 % | 46 % | 33 % | 30 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 34′ | Tension | 56 % | 49 % | 34 % | 24 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 39′ | Humor | 60 % | 55 % | 25 % | 19 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 45′ | Humor | 59 % | 55 % | 25 % | 21 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 50′ | Humor | 57 % | 51 % | 34 % | 28 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 55′ | Humor | 58 % | 50 % | 40 % | 30 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 60′ | Humor | 59 % | 54 % | 40 % | 29 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 66′ | Humor | 63 % | 60 % | 36 % | 35 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 71′ | Humor | 65 % | 63 % | 32 % | 39 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 76′ | Humor | 63 % | 60 % | 33 % | 29 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 81′ | Humor | 61 % | 55 % | 43 % | 29 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 87′ | Humor | 63 % | 48 % | 49 % | 35 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 92′ | Disgust | 65 % | 35 % | 51 % | 36 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 97′ | Tension | 69 % | 34 % | 49 % | 31 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 102′ | Humor | 68 % | 47 % | 33 % | 18 % |
Cinderella
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Sister Jessica
Man Living in Barrel
The Prince
2nd Merchant
Details
- Directed by
- Terry Gilliam
- Written by
- Terry Gilliam, Charles Alverson
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 1977
- Runtime
- 105 min
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Humor
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Free
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
