Citizen Vigilante
2026 · 89 min · Director: Uwe Boll
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
A man takes justice into his own hands, hunting down criminals. His vigilante crusade makes him a social media star but puts him at odds with the local police chief.
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
Citizen Vigilante (2026) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Tension 35%, Anger 25%, Excitement 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Tension35%
- Anger25%
- Excitement20%
- Satisfaction10%
- Confusion10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Tension, Anger, Excitement. Genres: Thriller, Crime, Action. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Tension, Anger and Excitement. Its IMDb rating of 5.7/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 59/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Disturbing
- Tension
- Fear
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Disturbing
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Disturbing | Tension | Fear |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Sadness | 67 % | 52 % | 57 % | 43 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 7′ | Curiosity | 60 % | 45 % | 51 % | 35 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 11′ | Tension | 55 % | 40 % | 49 % | 33 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 16′ | Curiosity | 53 % | 39 % | 44 % | 28 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 20′ | Sadness | 56 % | 40 % | 45 % | 25 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 24′ | Tension | 51 % | 31 % | 43 % | 23 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 29′ | Curiosity | 38 % | 19 % | 25 % | 10 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 33′ | Curiosity | 38 % | 18 % | 24 % | 8 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 38′ | Tension | 55 % | 32 % | 50 % | 30 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 42′ | Tension | 74 % | 56 % | 66 % | 53 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 47′ | Disturbing | 69 % | 59 % | 51 % | 44 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 51′ | Curiosity | 53 % | 39 % | 38 % | 24 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 56′ | Curiosity | 57 % | 38 % | 49 % | 29 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 60′ | Tension | 75 % | 60 % | 68 % | 50 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 65′ | Disturbing | 83 % | 76 % | 73 % | 59 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 69′ | Disturbing | 84 % | 83 % | 73 % | 61 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 73′ | Disturbing | 88 % | 86 % | 81 % | 73 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 78′ | Tension | 84 % | 79 % | 81 % | 70 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 82′ | Tension | 70 % | 64 % | 64 % | 48 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 87′ | Disturbing | 62 % | 58 % | 50 % | 35 % |
Riches to rags
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Yusuf
Ibrahim
Dehlia
Sarna
Raped Girl
Raped Girl's Father
Judge Reinhold
Ivo
Bullied Kid
Woman in the Supermarket
Child in the supermarket
Mafia Boss
Mafia Bodyguard 1
Mafia Bodyguard 2
Jack
Details
Where to watch
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.





