Gung Ho
1986 · 111 min · Director: Ron Howard
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Hunt Stevenson works for a large car manufacturer that has just been bought out by a Japanese firm. Suddenly finding himself having to justify his own job, he's forced to choose between redundancy or the seemingly inhuman Japanese work ethic that the new owners have brought with them.
Emotional fingerprint
Gung Ho (1986) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 40%, Anxiety 25%, Empathy 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Humor40%
- Anxiety25%
- Empathy20%
- Satisfaction10%
- Hope5%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Anxiety, Empathy. Genres: Comedy, Drama. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Anxiety and Empathy. Its IMDb rating of 6.3/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 68/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Humor
- Hope
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Hope
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Joy
Dominant emotion: Sympathy
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Humor | Hope |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Hope | 45 % | 20 % | 42 % | 35 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Humor | 45 % | 21 % | 43 % | 29 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 14′ | Joy | 46 % | 15 % | 41 % | 30 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 19′ | Hope | 50 % | 15 % | 38 % | 41 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 25′ | Joy | 51 % | 26 % | 35 % | 40 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 31′ | Humor | 49 % | 31 % | 40 % | 25 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 36′ | Humor | 49 % | 31 % | 41 % | 18 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 42′ | Joy | 49 % | 36 % | 31 % | 15 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 47′ | Sympathy | 50 % | 45 % | 24 % | 14 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 53′ | Tension | 55 % | 51 % | 23 % | 23 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 58′ | Hope | 55 % | 44 % | 26 % | 30 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 64′ | Sympathy | 55 % | 40 % | 30 % | 21 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 69′ | Tension | 60 % | 54 % | 29 % | 10 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 75′ | Tension | 64 % | 64 % | 25 % | 8 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 80′ | Tension | 66 % | 64 % | 20 % | 11 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 86′ | Sympathy | 64 % | 55 % | 23 % | 24 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 92′ | Sympathy | 57 % | 44 % | 30 % | 40 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 97′ | Hope | 56 % | 45 % | 34 % | 48 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 103′ | Tension | 61 % | 43 % | 40 % | 45 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 108′ | Joy | 67 % | 27 % | 47 % | 43 % |
Man in a hole
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Junior
Ito
Umeki Kazihiro
Kazuo
Matsumura
Tony
Luke
Details
- Directed by
- Ron Howard
- Written by
- Lowell Ganz, Edwin Blum, Babaloo Mandel
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 1986
- Runtime
- 111 min
- Country
- United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Humor
- Data updated
Where to watch
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
