Love in Thoughts
2004 · 89 min · Director: Achim von Borries
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Weimar, Germany, in 1927. Best friends Günther and Paul ask themselves: is that really it, the highest point in life? They are convinced that they want to enjoy their lives to the full and without compromises - and they demand the same of love. Together with Günther's sister Hilde they spend a weekend in a summer house in the country, outside Berlin. Paul is fascinated by the girl and falls in love with her. And at first it looks like Paul's feelings are returned. But Hilde loves another. Secretly, she's meeting with a young, good-looking boy named Hans - Günther's former lover. But Hans, who works in the kitchen of a restaurant/dance club, is a young man from a much lower class. Then an excessive party takes place in the garden of the summer house. When Hans surprisingly joins the celebration, a roller coaster ride of feelings is set into motion which soon gets very much out of control.
Emotional fingerprint
Love in Thoughts (2004) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Love 30%, Melancholy 25%, Sadness 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Love30%
- Melancholy25%
- Sadness20%
- Anxiety15%
- Empathy10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Love, Melancholy, Sadness. Genres: Drama, Romance. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Love, Melancholy and Sadness. Its IMDb rating of 6.9/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 69/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Sadness
- Tension
- Disturbing
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Joy
Dominant emotion: Love
Dominant emotion: Disturbing
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Sadness | Tension | Disturbing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Tension | 63 % | 42 % | 55 % | 48 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 7′ | Joy | 50 % | 21 % | 33 % | 24 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 11′ | Love | 44 % | 4 % | 14 % | 4 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 16′ | Love | 44 % | 1 % | 11 % | 0 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 20′ | Love | 41 % | 8 % | 16 % | 1 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 24′ | Love | 48 % | 21 % | 31 % | 19 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 29′ | Disturbing | 61 % | 30 % | 51 % | 48 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 33′ | Tension | 61 % | 21 % | 54 % | 49 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 38′ | Joy | 55 % | 16 % | 48 % | 28 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 42′ | Tension | 56 % | 26 % | 48 % | 14 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 47′ | Love | 51 % | 31 % | 39 % | 9 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 51′ | Sadness | 45 % | 34 % | 31 % | 13 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 56′ | Sadness | 47 % | 40 % | 35 % | 20 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 60′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 65′ | Tension | 53 % | 38 % | 48 % | 12 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 69′ | Tension | 60 % | 46 % | 55 % | 30 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 73′ | Sadness | 71 % | 56 % | 68 % | 53 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 78′ | Tension | 74 % | 57 % | 58 % | 48 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 82′ | Sadness | 75 % | 63 % | 35 % | 38 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 87′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
Riches to rags
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Love in Thoughts. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Rosa
Dr. Frey
Bittner
Pit
Macke
Vorsitzender bei Gericht
Kommissar Peters
Kommissar Kraus
Fritz
Lehrer Krähe
Partyguest
Details
- Directed by
- Achim von Borries
- Written by
- Achim von Borries, Henk Handloegten, Annette Hess, Hendrik Handloegten, Alexander Pfeuffer
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2004
- Runtime
- 89 min
- Country
- Germany
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Love
- Data updated
Where to watch
Also on
Availability varies by country
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
