feeldb

Code 46

2003 · 93 min · Director: Michael Winterbottom ★ IMDb 6.1 · 21,904 ratings

Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)

This movie is a love story set in a Brave New World-type near-future where cities are heavily controlled and accessible only through checkpoints. People cannot travel unless they have "papeles" (papers in Spanish; words and sentences in many languages, especially Spanish, French, and Chinese are mixed with English in this new world), a special travel permit issued by the totalitarian government, the "Sphinx". Outside these cities, the desert has taken over and shanty towns are jammed with non-citizens, people without IDs forced to live primitive lives. William Geld (Tim Robbins) is a family man who works as a government investigator. When he is sent to Shanghai to solve a case of fake IDs, he meets a woman named Maria Gonzales (Samantha Morton). Although he realizes she is behind the forgeries, he cannot help but fall completely in love with her. He hides her crime and they have a wild, passionate affair that can last only as long as his visa: twenty-four hours. Back home, William is obsessed with the memory of Maria. When the original investigation is inevitably re-opened a week later and William is sent back to finish the work he started, he tracks her down only to discover she has been accused of a Code 46 violation, and any further relationship is therefore impossible.

Trailer for Code 46

Playing the trailer connects to YouTube. No connection is made until you choose to play.

Rate how it felt
Working…

Your viewing check-in

Emotional fingerprint

Code 46 (2003) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Melancholy 30%, Love 25%, Anxiety 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure

  1. Love25%

AI estimate · no viewer votes yet

How we measure

AI estimate

Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.

Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.

Why it feels this way

The strongest emotional signals are Melancholy, Love, Anxiety. Genres: Drama, Romance, Sci-Fi. AI estimate.

Is it worth watching?

Consider this title if you are looking for Melancholy, Love and Anxiety. Its IMDb rating of 6.1/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 62/100.

How did it make you feel?

Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.

Pick up to three · 0/3

1
2
3

Emotional journey

AI · from subtitles
  • Sadness
  • Curiosity
  • Love

Not enough subtitle evidence

No dominant emotion

Dominant emotion: Curiosity

Dominant emotion: Love

Dominant emotion: Sadness

Dominant emotion: Disturbing

Dominant emotion: Tension

Sadness
Curiosity
Love
Emotional journey Emotional intensity over the film’s runtime, from quieter to stronger on a fixed 0–1 scale. Hatched intervals have insufficient subtitle evidence. The table provides the values. Not enough subtitle evidence
Ending hidden

Dominant emotion

Intensity dips around 3 %, then peaks around 93 %.Ending hidden

Emotional journey
%Approximate minuteDominant emotionOverall intensitySadnessCuriosityLove
2.5 %≈ 2′Curiosity43 %18 %45 %10 %
7.5 %≈ 7′Curiosity46 %15 %49 %13 %
12.5 %≈ 12′Curiosity46 %10 %46 %21 %
17.5 %≈ 16′Love45 %6 %41 %31 %
22.5 %≈ 21′Love48 %10 %38 %40 %
27.5 %≈ 26′Love49 %16 %26 %45 %
32.5 %≈ 30′Love46 %21 %16 %38 %
37.5 %≈ 35′Sadness50 %35 %24 %25 %
42.5 %≈ 40′Sadness57 %40 %41 %16 %
47.5 %≈ 44′Curiosity60 %29 %54 %13 %
52.5 %≈ 49′Curiosity65 %34 %53 %16 %
57.5 %≈ 53′Disturbing71 %50 %49 %25 %
62.5 %≈ 58′Curiosity66 %48 %51 %31 %
67.5 %≈ 63′Curiosity59 %38 %45 %29 %
72.5 %≈ 67′Tension59 %35 %34 %30 %
77.5 %≈ 72′Love64 %37 %29 %44 %
82.5 %≈ 77′Disturbing70 %39 %29 %49 %
87.5 %≈ 81′Tension75 %46 %27 %43 %
92.5 %≈ 86′Sadness80 %63 %22 %42 %
97.5 %≈ 91′Not enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidence
Riches to rags

Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.

Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.

Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.

Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.

Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.

Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.

AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗

Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers

Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.

0 responses so far

Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.

Cast

OP
Om Puri

NE
Nabil Elouahabi

Vendor

Om Puri

Bahkland

EM
Emil Marwa

Mohan

NF
Nina Fog

Wole

BL
Bruno Lastra

Bikku

Togo Igawa

Driver

NM
Natalie Mendoza

Sphinx Receptionist

JB
Jeanne Balibar

Sylvie

MJ
Mick Jones

Himself

NW
Nina Wadia

Hospital Receptionist

Archie Panjabi

Check In

SB
Sarah Backhouse

Weather Girl

JI
Jonathan Ibbotson

Boxer

SK
Shelley King

William's Boss

Essie Davis

Doctor

CS
Christopher Simpson

Paul

Details

Type
Movies
Released
2003
Runtime
93 min
Country
United Kingdom, United States
Ratings
★ IMDb 6.1 · 21,904 ratings
Feels mostly
Melancholy
Data updated

Where to watch

Data: JustWatch · Wikidata

Feels similar

More like this →

Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.