Send Me No Flowers
1964 · 100 min · Director: Norman Jewison
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
When a hypochondriac assumes that he is dying, he makes an elaborate plan to ensure his wife's happiness. However, trouble ensues when she misunderstands his intentions.
Emotional fingerprint
Send Me No Flowers (1964) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 40%, Surprise 20%, Love 15%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Surprise, Love. Genres: Comedy, Romance. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Surprise and Love. Its IMDb rating of 7.0/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 70/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Humor
- Relief
- Love
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Sympathy
Dominant emotion: Relief
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Humor | Relief | Love |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Humor | 43 % | 43 % | 0 % | 2 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Humor | 44 % | 43 % | 0 % | 4 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 13′ | Humor | 43 % | 42 % | 5 % | 4 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 18′ | Humor | 44 % | 42 % | 10 % | 2 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 23′ | Humor | 47 % | 46 % | 5 % | 7 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 28′ | Humor | 48 % | 47 % | 0 % | 16 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 33′ | Humor | 49 % | 47 % | 0 % | 18 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 38′ | Humor | 55 % | 54 % | 3 % | 14 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 43′ | Humor | 58 % | 56 % | 6 % | 16 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 48′ | Humor | 56 % | 54 % | 3 % | 22 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 53′ | Humor | 54 % | 53 % | 0 % | 29 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 58′ | Humor | 53 % | 46 % | 1 % | 33 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 63′ | Sympathy | 54 % | 43 % | 4 % | 35 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 68′ | Humor | 55 % | 46 % | 14 % | 34 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 73′ | Relief | 55 % | 50 % | 22 % | 23 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 78′ | Humor | 57 % | 54 % | 16 % | 11 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 83′ | Humor | 57 % | 55 % | 21 % | 9 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 88′ | Humor | 59 % | 54 % | 26 % | 16 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 93′ | Humor | 65 % | 57 % | 29 % | 26 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 98′ | Relief | 68 % | 59 % | 45 % | 35 % |
Riches to rags
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Send Me No Flowers. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Linda Bullard
Cora
Woman Commuter
Nurse
Country Club Member (uncredited)
TV Announcer (voice) (uncredited)
Secretary (uncredited)
Details
- Directed by
- Norman Jewison
- Written by
- Julius J. Epstein
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 1964
- Runtime
- 100 min
- Country
- United States of America
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Humor
- Data updated
Where to watch
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
